We then expanded the sample to include examples from two further groups of academics: 30 academics who have a RG Score and multiple publications; and a further 30 were added who have a RG Score, multiple publications, and have posted at least one question and answer. Also, ResearchGate does not hide the fact that it modifies its algorithm and the data sources being considered along the way. To customize who sees what, follow these steps: Go to your Privacy Settings Select the drop-down menu underneath the About you section Choose who can see your profile information by selecting. With these developments in mind, it becomes even more important for us bibliometrics researchers to inform our stakeholders (such as funding agencies and university administrators) about the problems with individual metrics. Yes Get all latest content delivered straight to your inbox. ; the possibility of the score being linked to financial value warrants further exploration and critical assessment. Enjoy! When not composing tech articles, you can find her bringing characters to life in her fictional stories, reading something intriguing, or spending time with her near and dear ones. Quick and Easy Ways to See Who Views Your Facebook Profile, Method 1: Try viewing the InitialChatFriendsList, Method 2: Perform a privacy checkup (only for iOS users). Soon the feature to see who views your Facebook may be rolled out for Android and other users, but there is no official communication about the same yet. , rather than a site for active interaction with others. Looking at the pie charts of RG Score breakdowns, academics who have a RG Score on their profile can therefore be thought of as including several subgroups: those whose score is based only on their publications; scores based on question and answer activity; and scores based on a combination of any of the three. {"smallUrl":"https:\/\/www.wikihow.com\/images\/thumb\/a\/ab\/See-Who-Views-Your-Facebook-Profile-Step-1-Version-4.jpg\/v4-460px-See-Who-Views-Your-Facebook-Profile-Step-1-Version-4.jpg","bigUrl":"\/images\/thumb\/a\/ab\/See-Who-Views-Your-Facebook-Profile-Step-1-Version-4.jpg\/aid2904241-v4-728px-See-Who-Views-Your-Facebook-Profile-Step-1-Version-4.jpg","smallWidth":460,"smallHeight":345,"bigWidth":728,"bigHeight":546,"licensing":"
License: Fair Use<\/a> (screenshot)
\n<\/p><\/div>"}. What About the People at the Top of My Friends List? Now I pretty much get no email from them. I visit Scholar profiles quite often; in particular to see the latest and the most cited work of an author of which I already have discovered a good article. But at one point I was spammed with emails from ResearchGate of former collaborators, with whom I published or did not publish, and it still goes on. 6. As the JIF is based on the mean number of citations, a single paper with a high number of citations can therefore, In addition, the correlation between JIF and individual citations to articles, has been steadily decreasing since the 1990s. How do I turn off these notifications sent to other users when I view their profiles? Especially with otherwise paywalled papers, I had a very good return when contacting authors via researchgate. You can showcase any article, preprint, or book which you've authored that is less than 2 years old. Reads, which is defined as the sum of views and downloads of a researchers work, is now the main focus of their e-mails and the metric is prominently displayed in a researchers profile. The US-based NISO Working Group on altmetrics has done a lot to help put altmetrics on a solid foundation, so I would just like to point out that one of their principles is also transparency and openness. Your email address will not be published. Niharika is a passionate soul who finds immense satisfaction in putting all her thoughts in writing. We generate only one view per person even if a user views any particular contact multiple times in a day. Select the main dropdown menu (i.e., three lines in the top corner of the application). RGalgorithm looks at how your peers receive and evaluatethesecontributions, and who they are. I think ResearchGate has huge potential and many benefits if used appropriately. ResearchGate has only sent invitations from me to two people. Then good things does not come easily. Multiple regression analysis indicated that, RG Score was significantly predicted by a combination of number of views, natural logs of impact points, answers posted and number of publications. Planned Maintenance scheduled March 2nd, 2023 at 01:00 AM UTC (March 1st, Should I send a "cease-and-desist" letter to ResearchGate? Finally, I would like to take issue with the assertion that Mendeley is following in ResearchGates lead by spamming our users. Next, tap on your Account icon, scroll down and select more on your profile. i only wish it was a little easier to access all the apps features (without having to go through moneyary considerations) . Sorry we couldn't be helpful. To find out more about cookies and change your preferences, visit our, Series: Rapid Response Publishing in Covid Times, Subscribe to the Impact Blog via Email or RSS. Impact points proved to be very relevant; for this exploratory sample at least, impact points accounted for a large proportion of the variation in the data (68%). With this app it becomes simple to determine who viewed your profile. No, you have to be logged in to Facebook in order to add friends to your account. Use it to try out great new products and services nationwide without paying full pricewine, food delivery, clothing and more. You may repeat the above steps to find all your profile viewers. But don't worrythere are still several things you can do to find out who's checking you out! The JIF, however, was not introduced as a measure to evaluate individuals, but as a measure to guide libraries purchasing decisions of journals. data, slides) is definitely a step into the right direction, and the idea of considering interactions when thinking about academic reputation has some merit. Impact of Social Sciences Bringing together bibliometrics research from different disciplines what can we learn from each other? (Android). Since its beginning in 2008, the website has over 10 million registered professionals. With these developments in mind, it becomes even more important for us bibliometrics researchers to inform our stakeholders (such as funding agencies and university administrators) about the problems with individual metrics. document.getElementById( "ak_js" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() ); We at TechPout promise to put forth stories that help people to learn and simplify their digital life. Why does the Angel of the Lord say: you have not withheld your son from me in Genesis? which version/s can be used and on which platforms they can be uploaded. But I do find it very helpful for keeping up with the state-of-the-art in my area. The charts on this page show whohas viewed your profile. The profile stats page contains weekly information about your activities, institution, and country. The overall idea is good, but they need to find a way to get quality contributions, not only quantity. We will soon return with another useful piece of tech information. When I first joined the site several years ago, I was hugely disappointed and quickly realised that I would have to wait and see if it amounted to anything. The high number of messages prove to be very successful for ResearchGate: according to a study by Nature from 2014, ResearchGate is the most well known social network among researchers; 35% of surveyed researchers say that they signed up for ResearchGate because they received an e-mail. Using the natural log of impact points will have the effect of diminishing returns for those with the highest impact points, so it could be speculated that the natural log is used to encourage less experienced academics. I think it is worth mentioning that ResearchGate's policy on invitations has improved. Citations cannot be the main factor for evaluating a researchers work. Next to each instance of buddy_id in the results, you'll see a user ID number and a person's name. 7. Still, if they aren't using a. One of the principles of the Leiden Manifesto states for example: Keep data collection and analytical processes open, transparent and simple, and it continues: Recent commercial entrants should be held to the same standards; no one should accept a black-box evaluation machine. Transparency is the only way measures can be put into context and the only way biases which are inherent in all socially created metrics can be uncovered. The developer provided this information and may update it over time. With metrics becoming ubiquitous in research assessment, as evidenced in the recent HEFCE report, , we are poised to see the formulation of many more. They can tell if your phone number has been used to contact any other registered phone number with a Facebook account. is there a chinese version of ex. But as @Cosima mentioned, you need to invest some time setting things up, making sure the settings are appropriate. Our analysis shows that the RG Score incorporates the Journal Impact Factor to evaluate individual researchers. There are a number of interesting ideas in the RG Score: including research outputs other than papers (e.g. By clicking Preview, you can also choose which of your co-authors you would like to invite. Your profile contributions page shows a summary of your activities when you are on ResearchGate. Using analytic algorithms, big data and artificial intelligence , we will list the people who have viewed your profile. Therefore, online networks such as Reddit have started to moderate downvotes. It's also possible that some of your most frequent viewers are people you rarely interact with at all! You can always control who views what information on your own profile by going to the'Privacy Center' in the Settings of your Truecaller app. We deem these shortcomings to be so problematic that the RG Score should not be considered as a measure of scientific reputation in its current form.The measure comes with bold statements: , the RG Score is a new way to measure your scientific reputation; it was designed to help you measure and leverage your standing within the scientific community. See, for example, the website of the publishers Coalition for Responsible Sharing: Coalition for Responsible Sharing: Status Report on ResearchGate, ARC and NHMRC advise against the use of platforms such as ResearchGate in the specific context of researchers meeting their OA policy compliance requirements, as they lack the necessary commitment the funders seek to long-term preservation, data reuse, publisher copyright requirements and end-user privacy afforded by institutional repositories. You can customize your Invitation settings at any time. if you haven't already logged in, log in to your account. Why is the article "the" used in "He invented THE slide rule"? The platform revolves around research papers, a question and answering system, and a job board. Love it, love it, the only thing I'd tweak would be to add a time / date stamp; please! This is exemplified by the many questions in ResearchGates own question and answering system pertaining to the exact calculation of the RG Score. A guide on how to manage, promote, and protect your online scholarly identity as a current or future researcher, academic, or scholar. InStalker Reports is the only app you need to see hidden stories! 8. But there are many good reasons why this is a bad practice. wikiHow is where trusted research and expert knowledge come together. With such high aims, it seemed to be appropriate to take a closer look at the RG Score and to evaluate its capability as a measure of scientific reputation. You can also sign up on Google Scholar and it will assign your papers to your profile, or you can insert papers that Google does not find. Includes discussion boardsso can post questions,provide answersor simply join or track the conversation. This is exemplified by, in ResearchGates own question and answering system pertaining to the exact calculation of the RG Score. Kraker, P., & Lex, E. (2015). Everybody knows where to find those sites so the links aren't useful. If you would like to disable invitations entirely, simply click Turn off all. Notify me of follow-up comments by email. For me, it has been exactly the way it was for einpoklum, researchgate has been a great resource so far, a lot of people in my field are active there and I have not received a single "spam" mail. He seems to be keeping the list updated with new problems or improvements. Keep yourself updated with the latest technology and trends with TechPout. Furthermore, the score misses any activities that takes place outside of ResearchGate; for example, Twitter is more frequently the site for actively discussing research. Evidence suggests that academics who use ResearchGate tend to, view it as an online business card or curriculum vitae. There is a prevalent view in the bibliometrics community that transparency and openness are important features of any metric. The profile on ResearchGate shows an overviewof the researchers work: publications, professional expertise, institutions, contributions, and all the questions they have answered on the website. Not accurate. To accept cookies, click continue. Transparency in metrics is the only way scholarly measures can be put into context and the only way biases which are inherent in all socially created metrics can be uncovered. Without taking any acces of whatsapp it is showing who viewed our dp. I played with my settings and the undesirable ones stopped; completely, or somehow my junk filter picked it up. Unfortunately, there's no way to know for sure. Furthermore, intransparency makes it very hard for outsiders to detect gaming of the system. ResearchGate has received substantial financial backing from venture capitalists and Bill Gates, but it is not clear how the platform will generate revenue; the possibility of the score being linked to financial value warrants further exploration and critical assessment. By reverse engineering the score, they find that a significant weight is linked to impact points a similar metric to the widely discredited journal impact factor. But I don't think Google Scholar means to be the most exact citation count as accepted by your rating committee. Finally, it should be pointed out that the RG Score is not the only bad metric out there. First, the. ResearchGate does present its users with a breakdown of the individual parts of the score, i.e., publications, questions, answers, followers (also shown as a pie-chart), and to what extent these parts contribute to your score. The profile on ResearchGate shows an overview of the researcher's work: publications, professional expertise, institutions, contributions, and all the questions they have answered on the website. I have one of those half-dead profiles as many colleagues actually (still?) Is That Facebook Buyer or Seller Legit? Important (OTP) messages are not found in my inbox? I also notice that some colleagues use ResearchGate like a chess board and game it. Over the years, it has also been used for evaluating individual researchers. | The Research Whisperer. In recent years, ResearchGate has become more aggressive in marketing its platform via e-mail. You can already search for journal articles and or researchers in Google Scholar and Scopus, to name just a few. What are some tools or methods I can purchase to trace a water leak? There is a certain amount of conservatism in research that may cause this. One of the focal points in ResearchGates e-mails is a researchers latest ResearchGate Score (RG Score). If you received a notification saying that "someone has viewed your profile", it means that someone has searched for you on Truecaller, either using your number or your name. Navigate to Facebook and log in to your account. As a small thank you, wed like to offer you a $30 gift card (valid at GoNift.com). Still, in terms of visibility, I think that my publications do get more views and downloads compared to my personal site - well, partly because I don't know how many they get there. What is the best way to deprotonate a methyl group? Last Updated: Jun 15, 2022 1:57 PM. A few people who are close to my field have written me due in part or in full to noticing me on RG. Multiple regression analysis indicated that RG Score was significantly predicted by a combination of number of views, natural logs of impact points, answers posted and number of publications. It shows the topics that you are following, list of awards, contact information, etc. A ResearchGate profile is broken down into five tabs. All you have to do is, read this article with the utmost attention to learn how to see who views your Facebook. Let's hope for the best. While some apps and websites claim they can show you your recent profile views, they don't work. How to see who views your Facebook profile the most 1. With the help of WProfile - Who Viewed My Profile you can check who visited your profile, who viewed your profile picture, your status update and general profile info. We do not spam our users and we never have. :/, The question is about ResearchGate. Open Facebook. There are now many different ways to increase your research visibility: Google Scholar, laboratory/faculty/industry or even personal websites, and LinkedIn, to name a few. But it also needs to be. Also you should give summary of all those persons who have visited along with the date and time. As an example, we have plotted Peters RG Score from August 2012 to April 2015. Click on your Profile Image. Anonymous downvoting has been criticised in the past as it often happens without explanation. I recognise the site's current major flaws, but am optimistic about its future role in the research community. Note: Number, email, and addresses are not visible until you . Keep up with tech in just 5 minutes a week! I recently got spammed by researchgate because someone ". It is still displayed in every profile and it is also used as an additional information in many of the sites features, e.g. With such high aims, it seemed to be appropriate to take a closer look at the RG Score and to evaluate its capability as a measure of scientific reputation. The wikiHow Tech Team also followed the article's instructions and verified that they work. Find the users ID. I choose to follow both researchers Ive met and strangers who recently published a useful article and might publish more in the same area. 6. The high number of messages prove to be very successful for ResearchGate: according to a study by Nature from 2014, ResearchGate is the most well known social network among researchers; 35 percent of surveyed researchers say that . Peter is an open science advocate collaborating with the Open Knowledge Foundationand the Open Access Network Austria. It may come as no surprise that this strategy has since been adopted by many of ResearchGates competitors, including Academia.edu and Mendeley. With this app it becomes simple to determine who viewed your profile. . With the. If they don't manage to get high-quality interactions to happen soon, their name may end up remaining associated with spam. First, the overview highlights some of the most important things about the researcher. ResearchGate is a global platform where researchers come together to discover each other's work, interact, and connect. Publish with open access or a publisher where you can put the preprint on your webpage. Do the referees see the profile of authors? Therefore, do not expect many high-quality interactions to happen. There are some "hidden" settings that will repeatedly send out "Invitations" and even "Invitation reminders" to your peers (make sure to disable this right at signup time, before "claiming" a single paper!). We use cookies on this site to understand how you use our content, and to give you the best browsing experience.
Andrew Jones Welsh Newsreader,
James David Blue Accident,
Is There Really A Lionel Shrike Tree In Central Park,
Articles R
